Barber v. State, 638 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Barber v. State, 638 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R.R. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Rivers v. State, 677 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Swift v. State, 638 So.2d 193, 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (“It appears that, in part, the lower court’s cost assessments and public defender’s lien were imposed without following proper procedure or without adequate factual or legal basis shown in the record.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) RR v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Rivers v. State, 677 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Swift v. State, 638 So.2d 193, 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) ("It appears that, in part, the lower court's cost assessments and public defender's lien were imposed without following proper procedure or without adequate factual or legal basis shown in the record.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Apo
Haw. App. · 1996 · confidence medium
See, e.g., State v. Newman, 4 Neb.App. 265 , 541 N.W.2d 662, 672 , aff'd, 250 Neb. 226 , 548 N.W.2d 739 (1996) (affirming denial of motion to suppress the defendant’s jacket and shoes as harmless error in a first degree sexual assault conviction, where the shoes were not offered into evidence, the jacket was cumulative evidence, and witnesses identified the defendant at trial and from a photograph where he was not wearing the jacket); Penzloza v. State, 638 So.2d 193, 194 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1994) (affirming denial of motion to suppress audiotapes found in the defendant’s trunk in burglary an…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leslie Alan BARBER
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 94-876.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jun 17, 1994.
638 So. 2d 193
Leslie Alan Barber, pro se., No appearance for appellee.
Cobb, Diamantis, Griffin.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The order of the lower court and its attachments plainly show that appellant is not entitled to the jail time credit he claims. E.g. Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.