Gamble v. State, 643 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Gamble v. State, 643 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Smith v. State (fladistctapp, 1995-04-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Smith v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gamble v. State, 643 So.2d 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (written sentencing order must conform to trial court’s oral pronouncement); White v. State, 624 So.2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eric Lamont GAMBLE
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 94-868.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 19, 1994.
643 So. 2d 130
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Julie M. Levitt, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Baskin, Gersten, Jorgenson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order denying his 3.850 motion. We reverse the order and remand with directions to correct the defendant’s sentencing order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. The trial court clearly pronounced that defendant was not being sentenced as a youthful offender; however, on the sentencing sheet it appears that defendant is being sentenced as a youthful offender. This sentencing order must be conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. White v. State, 624 So.2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded with directions.