Harrison v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr., 695 So. 2d 1340 (La. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Harrison v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr., 695 So. 2d 1340 (La. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Walter (lactapp, 1997-07-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Walter
La. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
A “reasonable probability” of a different result is accordingly shown when the government’s evidentiary suppression “undermines confidence in the outcome of trial.” Quoting Kyles and, in turn, Bagley , the Louisiana Supreme Court instructed this Court to determine “whether, as the result of the State’s untimely disclosure, the inability of the defense to place [before the jury] all evidence relevant to the reliability of the victim’s identification testimony ‘undermines confidence in the outcome of trial.’ ” Walter, 96-1702, p. 1, 695 So.2d at 1341 (citations omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neil HARRISON
v.
STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and Office of State Police
No. 97-C-1086.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 20, 1997.
695 So. 2d 1340
Lemmon.
Published

In re Red River Entertain d/b/a; Harrah’s Casino Shreveport; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA96 0906; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 405-759.

Granted.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.