green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
David Kinder v. Michael a Purdy
See United States v. Kinder, No. 95-50139, at 1-6, 69 F.3d 536 (5th Cir. Oct.12, 1995).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Cooper
See McQueen v. Evans, 69 F.3d 536 , No. 95-50474 (5th Cir. Oct. 11, 1995) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Launza Jr v. City of Mesquite
See Wells v. Bonner, 45 F.3d 90, 95 (5th Cir. 1995) (noting that the proof necessary to establish a false arrest claim—that there was not probable cause to arrest on charge—would necessarily demonstrate the invalidity of the conviction for purposes of Heck); see also Joiner v. Smith, 69 F.3d 536, 539 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that, “to prove that the arrest was an unreasonable seizure, [the plaintiff] must demonstrate that [the officer] lacked probable cause to arrest for either charge, which would demonstrate the invalidity of [the plaintiff’s] convictions for obstructing traffic and d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil, Inc
See United States v. Cox, 342 F.2d 167, 172 (5th Cir.1965) (show cause order was interlocutory and not appealable); see also In re Avante Real Estate, Inc., 69 F.3d 536 (5th Cir.1995) (Table) (affirming district court's conclusion "that the Show Cause Order was not a final order and therefore not appealable, and that the bankruptcy court did not err in sanctioning [party] for [its] conduct”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grantham
v.
Johnson
v.
Johnson
95-20365.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 9, 1995.
Unpublished
Grantham
v.
Johnson[*]
NO. 95-20365
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Oct 06, 1995
Appeal From: S.D.Tex.,No. CA-H-94-2507
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2