Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc., 737 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc., 737 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Douglas v. Florida Power & Light, Inc. (fladistctapp, 2006-02-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Douglas v. Florida Power & Light, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc., 737 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (reviewing by appeal an order determining that the E/C were "entitled to a vocational evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e) and section 440.491, Florida Statutes (1997)”); Barnett Bank of Volusia County v. Pelle, 684 So.2d 311, 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (reviewing by appeal an order denying the E/C's "motion to compel an evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994)”); see also Lockheed Space Operations v. Langworthy, 686 So.2d 665, 666 (Fla. 1st DC…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John FLOWERS
v.
ABOVE-ALL-ROOFING, INC. and FCCI Mutual Insurance Company
No. 98-2050.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 30, 1999.
737 So. 2d 594
David L. Kahn of David L. Kahn, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant., H. George Kagan and Elliot B. Kula of Miller, Kagan, Rodriguez & Silver, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
Ervin, Webster, Wolf.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

As appellees’ counsel conceded at oral argument, that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) had no authority to enter the order under review and that the order also had no legally binding effect on the parties, we vacate the JCC’s order determining that the employer/carrier was entitled to a vocational evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e) and section 440.491, Florida Statutes (1997).

ERVIN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.