Notes of Decisions
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
· cites it 84× “[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
· cites it 24× “See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
Sharer v. Hotel Corp. of Am., 144 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1962).
· cites it 28× “15(5) (d) (2) to determine the benefits due the petitioner herein because, although in point of time or order of arrangement said section is prior to the section which creates the conflict heretofore found to exist, a thorough study and comprehensive analysis of Section 440.15…”
Escambia Cty. Council v. Goldsmith, 500 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
· cites it 25× “" The term "permanent impairment" is used in several portions of section 440.15, entitled "Compensation for disability.”
Staffmark v. Merrell, 43 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
· cites it 25× “See §§ 440.15(2)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat (2008).”
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
· cites it 22× “Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
Chaffee v. Miami Transfer Co., Inc., 288 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1974).
· cites it 25× “1954), that "disability", for purposes of Fla. Stat. § 440.15 (3)(u), refers to a diminution of earning capacity resulting from an injury, rather than to the physical impairment itself, commenting that the two were not necessarily proportional.”
Sasso v. Ram Prop. Mgmt., 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
· cites it 14× “1980); § 440.15(10), Fla. Stat. (1979). Also distinguishable is the case of the worker who tries to collect workers' compensation and unemployment compensation benefits, which is not permissible, Section 440.”
Ace Disposal v. Holley, 668 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
· cites it 28× “The employer or carrier is not required to make any payment of benefits for permanent total disability for any period during which the employee *647 willfully fails or refuses to report upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules or if any…”
— 440.15(1) — 50 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
Escambia Cty. Council v. Goldsmith, 500 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“" The term "permanent impairment" is used in several portions of section 440.15, entitled "Compensation for disability.”
— 440.15(1)(a) — 7 cases
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
— 440.15(1)(b) — 53 cases
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
— 440.15(1)(d) — 8 cases
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
— 440.15(1)(e) — 32 cases
— 440.15(1)(e)(1) — 3 cases
— 440.15(1)(f) — 13 cases
Ace Disposal v. Holley, 668 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
“The employer or carrier is not required to make any payment of benefits for permanent total disability for any period during which the employee *647 willfully fails or refuses to report upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules or if any…”
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
— 440.15(10) — 41 cases
Ace Disposal v. Holley, 668 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
“The employer or carrier is not required to make any payment of benefits for permanent total disability for any period during which the employee *647 willfully fails or refuses to report upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules or if any…”
Sasso v. Ram Prop. Mgmt., 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
“1980); § 440.15(10), Fla. Stat. (1979). Also distinguishable is the case of the worker who tries to collect workers' compensation and unemployment compensation benefits, which is not permissible, Section 440.”
— 440.15(10)(a) — 29 cases
— 440.15(10)(b) — 4 cases
— 440.15(10)(c) — 13 cases
Ace Disposal v. Holley, 668 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
“The employer or carrier is not required to make any payment of benefits for permanent total disability for any period during which the employee *647 willfully fails or refuses to report upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules or if any…”
— 440.15(11) — 6 cases
Sasso v. Ram Prop. Mgmt., 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
“1980); § 440.15(10), Fla. Stat. (1979). Also distinguishable is the case of the worker who tries to collect workers' compensation and unemployment compensation benefits, which is not permissible, Section 440.”
— 440.15(11)(b) — 1 case
— 440.15(12) — 8 cases
— 440.15(13) — 8 cases
— 440.15(2) — 40 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
— 440.15(2)(a) — 39 cases
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
— 440.15(2)(b) — 30 cases
— 440.15(2)(c) — 6 cases
— 440.15(2)(d) — 1 case
Ace Disposal v. Holley, 668 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
“The employer or carrier is not required to make any payment of benefits for permanent total disability for any period during which the employee *647 willfully fails or refuses to report upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules or if any…”
— 440.15(2)(e) — 1 case
— 440.15(3) — 82 cases
— 440.15(3)(a) — 84 cases
Escambia Cty. Council v. Goldsmith, 500 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“" The term "permanent impairment" is used in several portions of section 440.15, entitled "Compensation for disability.”
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
— 440.15(3)(a)(1) — 2 cases
— 440.15(3)(a)(3) — 9 cases
— 440.15(3)(a)(4) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(b) — 228 cases
Sasso v. Ram Prop. Mgmt., 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
“1980); § 440.15(10), Fla. Stat. (1979). Also distinguishable is the case of the worker who tries to collect workers' compensation and unemployment compensation benefits, which is not permissible, Section 440.”
— 440.15(3)(b)(1) — 4 cases
— 440.15(3)(b)(2) — 19 cases
— 440.15(3)(b)(3) — 2 cases
— 440.15(3)(b)(3)(a) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(b)(3)(d) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(b)(4) — 2 cases
— 440.15(3)(b)(4)(a) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(b)(4)(d) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(b)(6) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(b)(l) — 6 cases
— 440.15(3)(c) — 10 cases
— 440.15(3)(d) — 5 cases
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
— 440.15(3)(d)(2) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(e) — 2 cases
— 440.15(3)(f) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(g) — 5 cases
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
— 440.15(3)(i) — 1 case
Chaffee v. Miami Transfer Co., Inc., 288 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1974).
“1954), that "disability", for purposes of Fla. Stat. § 440.15 (3)(u), refers to a diminution of earning capacity resulting from an injury, rather than to the physical impairment itself, commenting that the two were not necessarily proportional.”
— 440.15(3)(m) — 2 cases
— 440.15(3)(n) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(p) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(s) — 3 cases
— 440.15(3)(t) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(u) — 27 cases
Chaffee v. Miami Transfer Co., Inc., 288 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1974).
“1954), that "disability", for purposes of Fla. Stat. § 440.15 (3)(u), refers to a diminution of earning capacity resulting from an injury, rather than to the physical impairment itself, commenting that the two were not necessarily proportional.”
— 440.15(3)(u)(2) — 1 case
— 440.15(3)(u)(3) — 1 case
— 440.15(4) — 40 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
— 440.15(4)(a) — 27 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
— 440.15(4)(b) — 46 cases
City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“Additionally, the Legislature left intact the provisions of § 440.15(1), F.S. (1994), providing essentially for a dollar for dollar reduction and offset of a claimant's workers' compensation indemnity benefits when the claimant becomes eligible for receipt of Social Security…”
— 440.15(4)(b)(1985) — 1 case
— 440.15(4)(c) — 4 cases
— 440.15(4)(e) — 14 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
— 440.15(5) — 44 cases
Sharer v. Hotel Corp. of Am., 144 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1962).
“15(5) (d) (2) to determine the benefits due the petitioner herein because, although in point of time or order of arrangement said section is prior to the section which creates the conflict heretofore found to exist, a thorough study and comprehensive analysis of Section 440.15…”
Staffmark v. Merrell, 43 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See §§ 440.15(2)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat (2008).”
— 440.15(5)(a) — 28 cases
Escambia Cty. Council v. Goldsmith, 500 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“" The term "permanent impairment" is used in several portions of section 440.15, entitled "Compensation for disability.”
Staffmark v. Merrell, 43 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See §§ 440.15(2)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat (2008).”
— 440.15(5)(b) — 17 cases
Staffmark v. Merrell, 43 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See §§ 440.15(2)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat (2008).”
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
Escambia Cty. Council v. Goldsmith, 500 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“" The term "permanent impairment" is used in several portions of section 440.15, entitled "Compensation for disability.”
— 440.15(5)(b)(1) — 1 case
— 440.15(5)(c) — 20 cases
Escambia Cty. Council v. Goldsmith, 500 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
“" The term "permanent impairment" is used in several portions of section 440.15, entitled "Compensation for disability.”
— 440.15(5)(d) — 6 cases
— 440.15(6) — 37 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
— 440.15(6)(b) — 1 case
— 440.15(6)(f) — 3 cases
— 440.15(7) — 13 cases
Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“See section 440.15(1) Florida Statutes (2007) (stating, to prove entitlement to permanent total disability benefits, employee “must establish that he or she is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, within a 50 mile radius” of his residence); see also section 440.”
— 440.15(8) — 4 cases
— 440.15(8)(a) — 1 case
— 440.15(8)(b) — 3 cases
— 440.15(9) — 21 cases
— 440.15(9)(a) — 23 cases
— 440.15(9)(c) — 5 cases
— 440.15(9)(d) — 1 case
— 440.15(S)(b) — 1 case
— 440.15(d) — 1 case
Sharer v. Hotel Corp. of Am., 144 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1962).
“15(5) (d) (2) to determine the benefits due the petitioner herein because, although in point of time or order of arrangement said section is prior to the section which creates the conflict heretofore found to exist, a thorough study and comprehensive analysis of Section 440.15…”
— 440.15(l) — 1 case
— 440.15(l)(a) — 1 case
— 440.15(l)(b) — 36 cases
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
— 440.15(l)(d) — 3 cases
Matrix Emp. Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
“[2] *624 Section 440.15, Florida Statutes, governs the payment of disability benefits to injured employees.”
— 440.15(l)(e) — 18 cases
— 440.15(l)(e)(3) — 1 case
— 440.15(l)(e)(l) — 4 cases
— 440.15(l)(f) — 3 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.