green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chatman v. Southern University at New Orleans
The Supreme Court thus vacated the appellate court’s decision and remanded the case for a new trial. 21 Citing Jones and Ragas , the Supreme Court in Masters reasoned that “[although the court of appeal correctly found the district court erred in excluding Randy Rainwater’s statement, the court of appeal erred in conducting a de novo review of the record in this ease, where a view of the witnesses is essential to a fair resolution of conflicting evidence.” Masters , 00-1330 at p. 1, 765 So.2d at 1055.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abney v. Smith
Id.; see Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co., Inc., 2000-1330 (La.6/30/00), 765 So.2d 1055, 1056 ; see also Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 94-1089, p. 7 (La.App. 1st Cir.6/23/95), 657 So.2d 1066, 1071 , writ denied, 95-1883 (La.11/17/95), 663 So.2d 720 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Turner v. Ostrowe
Schexnayder v. Louisiana, 522 U.S. 839 , 118 S.Ct. 115 , 139 L.Ed.2d 67 (1997), writ denied, 97-2251 (La.1/16/98), 706 So.2d 973 (statement that was not specifically authorized was not admissible); see also, e.g., Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co., Inc., 32,275 (La.App. 2nd Cir.10/29/99), 758 So.2d 171, 182 , writ granted and judgment vacated on other grounds, 00-1330 (La.6/30/00), 765 So.2d 1055 (recorded statement made by defendant's former employee to employer's insurance adjuster was an authorized admission); Pacholik v. Gray, 187 So.2d 480, 483 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1966) (communications by party's…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Angela THIBODEAUX
v.
FERRELLGAS, INC. (And Consolidated Cases)
v.
FERRELLGAS, INC. (And Consolidated Cases)
No. 2000-CC-1310.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 30, 2000.
Deny, Docket, Grant, Kimball, Knoll, Marcus, Writ.
Published
In re National Union Fire Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Cameron, 38th Judicial District Court Div. O, Nos. 10-14056, 10-14059, 10-14060, 10-14061, 10-14062, 10-14063, 10-14349; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 00 00207.
Granted. Judgment of the trial court denying relator’s motion for partial summary judgment is reversed. Partial summary judgment is rendered in favor of relator, dismissing plaintiffs’ claims against it for exemplary damages under former La.Civ.Code art. 2315.3. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
MARCUS, J., not on panel, KIMBALL, J., would grant and docket and KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.