Betty Jean Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co. Corp. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 307 F.3d 921 (9th Cir. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Betty Jean Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co. Corp. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 307 F.3d 921 (9th Cir. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Betty Jean MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC.; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Defendants-Appellees
99-17383.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 30, 2002.
307 F.3d 921
Andre P. Gaston, Bourdette & Partners, Visalia, CA, for appellant Betty Jean Myers., Keith D. Kessler, Howard, Rice, Nemer-ovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco, CA, for appellee R.J. Reynolds.
Boochever, O'Scannlain, Per Curiam, Tashima.
Published

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In light of the answer given to the question certified to the Supreme Court of California, Myers v. Phillip Morris Cos., 239 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir.2001), this case is REMANDED to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with Myers v. Philip Morris Cos., 28 Cal.4th 828, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 40, 50 P.3d 751 (2002) and Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 28 Cal.4th 856, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 61, 50 P.3d 769 (2002).