green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Struggs v. State of Florida
See Harrison v. State, 775 So. 2d 423, 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that a deputy’s testimony about his preparation of a photographic line-up, which mentioned a check of the defendant’s criminal history, did not impermissibly imply to the jury that the defendant had a prior criminal history, so as to warrant mistrial, where the prosecutor interrupted the deputy before the deputy could testify about the results of his check of the defendant’s criminal history, and the question asked by the prosecutor was not 3 one which would have normally elicited a statement about any criminal histo…
discussed
Cited "see"
TYEE MARTELE SPIKE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
See Harrison v. State, 775 So. 2d 423, 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding, in a robbery case, that testimony that a deputy had run a criminal history check of the defendant and that he had become "very familiar" with the defendant's vehicle because he "had seen that vehicle before" did not create reversible error because it "did not reference any prior criminal history or law enforcement contact"); see also Miller v. State, 605 So. 2d 492, 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding, in a case where the defendant shot and murdered a victim, that a witness's reference to the defendant's "previous dealings" w…
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell v. State
See Harrison v. State, 775 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)(holding that deputy's testimony about his preparation of photographic line-up, which testimony included a reference to a check of defendant's criminal history, did not impermissibly imply to jury that defendant had a prior criminal history, so as to warrant mistrial, where prosecutor interrupted deputy before deputy could testify as to results of his check of defendant's criminal history, and question asked by prosecutor was not one which would have normally elicited a statement with regard to any criminal history).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sherman CARTER
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D99-2939.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 10, 2001.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Kahn, Nortwick, Webster.
Published
PER CURIAM
AFFIRMED. Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954 (Fla.1996); Fripp v. State, 766 So.2d 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Bonham v. State, 450 So.2d.269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
KAHN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.