State v. Guidry, 862 So. 2d 965 (La. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Guidry, 862 So. 2d 965 (La. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Newsom (lactapp, 2017-09-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Newsom
La. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
The supreme court remanded to the fifth circuit "for written treatment and reconsideration in light of United States v. Leon , [ 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) ] which generally recognized a 'good faith' exception to precluding suppression." Id. at 945 ; see also State v. Guidry , 03-1944 (La. 11/21/03), 862 So.2d 965 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Philip GUIDRY
No. 2003-KK-1944.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Nov 21, 2003.
862 So. 2d 965
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Granted. This case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration and written treatment in light of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). See United States v. Richardson, 943 F.2d 547, 550 (5th Cir.1991); United States v. Turner, 926 F.2d 883, 886 (9th Cir.1991); United States v. Rome, 809 F.2d 665, 669-70 (10th Cir.1987). See also State v. Matthieu, 506 So.2d 1209, 1212 (La.1987) (“‘La.C.Cr.P. Art. 703 permits suppression only of evi[*966] dence obtained “by an unconstitutional search or seizure.” It was not intended to permit suppression of evidence seized by a warrant ‘illegal’ merely because technically contrary to law, unless the seizure is viola-tive of fundamental due process concepts.’ ’’(quoting State v. Bienvenu, 260 La. 1023, n. 1, 258 So.2d 72, 74 (1972)).