Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Co., a Delaware Corp., & Orscheln Co., a Missouri Corp., 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Co., a Delaware Corp., & Orscheln Co., a Missouri Corp., 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Michael Asfall v. Lausd (ca9, 2022-07-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Michael Asfall v. Lausd
9th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See 5 White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir. 2002) (“In an inconsistent verdict case, a court asks, not whether the verdict necessarily makes sense under any reading, but whether it can be read in light of the evidence to make sense.”), amended on denial of reh’g, 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 2003). 2.
cited Cited "see" Josephs v. Pacific Bell
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002), amended by 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 2003).
discussed Cited "see" Joshua Liam Josephs, AKA Joshua Liam Joesphs, Joshua Liam Josepths v. Pacific Bell, Does, 1-30, Inclusive (2×)
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1010 (9th Cir.2002), amended by 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.2003).
cited Cited "see" Schlecht v. American Power Pull Corp.
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1006 (9th Cir.2002), amended, 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.2003). .
cited Cited "see" Josephs v. Pacific Bell
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002), amended by 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 2003).
discussed Cited "see" Joshua Liam Josephs, AKA Joshua Liam Joesphs, Joshua Liam Josepths v. Pacific Bell, and Does, 1-30, Inclusive (2×)
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1010 (9th Cir.2002), amended by 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lister v. City of Las Vegas
D. Nev. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Further, when attempting to 17 reconcile the verdict, the court must “view [ ] the case in any reasonable way that makes the 18 verdicts consistent.” Flores v. City of Westminster, 873 F.3d 739 , 756–757 (9th Cir. 2017) (citing 19 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. John Labatt Ltd., 89 F.3d 1339, 1347 (8th Cir. 1996)); see also White v. Ford Motor 20 Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir. 2002) (“In an inconsistent verdict case, a court asks, not whether 21 the verdict necessarily makes sense under any reading, but whether it can be read in light of the 22 evidence to make sense.”), amended on denia…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hawthorne Savings v. Reliance Insurance
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998 , 1012 & n.54 (9th Cir. 2002), as amended, 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 2003).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. v. Reliance Insurance Co. of Illinois
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998 , 1012 & n. 54 (9th Cir.2002), as amended, 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.2003).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., White v. Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998 , 1012 & n. 54 (9th Cir.2002), as amended, 335 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ginny
v.
WHITE; Jimmie D. White, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri Corporation, Defendant
99-15185.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 3, 2003.
335 F.3d 833
Andrew L. Frey (argued), Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York, NY. On the brief were Evan M. Tager, Miriam R. Nemetz, Mayer, Brown, Rowe, & Maw, LLP, Washington, DC, W. Chris Wicker, Woodburn & Wedge, Reno, NV, for defendants-appellants., Shanin Specter (argued), Kline & Specter, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Don Nomura, Laxalt & .Nomura, LTD., Reno, NV, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
Wood, Kleinfeld, Graber.
Cited by 39 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

The majority opinion filed on December 3, 2002, is amended as follows.

At page 18, lines 19-21 of the slip opinion, delete the sentence ‘We need not decide whether the district court abused its discretion in allowing the opinion into evidence in this case, because we reverse on other grounds.” Also, delete footnote 26, referred to at the end of that sentence. Substitute the sentence, “Nevertheless, we cannot say that the district judge abused his discretion in allowing the opinion into evidence in this case.”

With these amendments, the petition for rehearing is denied. No further petitions for rehearing may be filed.