Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Prob. Officer La Cnty. California State Attorney Gen., 340 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Prob. Officer La Cnty. California State Attorney Gen., 340 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
01-56320.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 13, 2003.
340 F.3d 786
Charles M. Sevilla, Esq., Law Office, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Brentford Ferriera, Matthew G. Monfor-ton, Esq., District Attorney-Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent Appellee., Cliff Gardner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.
Published

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, [1] it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Fisher was recused.