green
Positive treatment
0.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Union Trust Co.
Recognizing that the tort of conversion has traditionally been confined to chattels; but see Omar v. Mezvinsky, 13 Conn. App. 533, 537 , 537 A.2d 1039 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 803 , 545 A.2d 1100 (1988) (entrusted funds can be subject to conversion), and cases cited therein; the plaintiff argues that: (1) the “chattel” involved here is the defendant’s internal debit and credit memo; or (2) failing that, we should expand our notion of what is subject to conversion to include intangible property rights such as the account at issue here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fdic v. Mutual Communication Associates, No. Cv 95 0067158 (Feb. 26, 1996)
See also Paine Webber Jackson Curtis, Inc. v. Winters, 13 Conn. App. 712 , 721 , 539 A.2d 592 (indicating that unadmitted allegations do not constitute documentary proof of the existence of a genuine issue as to any material fact), cert. denied, 208 Conn. 803 , 545 A.2d 1101 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gloria Licari
v.
Donald Blackwelder
v.
Donald Blackwelder
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 29, 1988.
Joseph M. Brophy, in support of the petition., Ridgely W. Brown, in opposition.
Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 46, is denied.