Yellow Cab Co. v. Greater Hartford Transit Dist., 614 A.2d 831 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Yellow Cab Co. v. Greater Hartford Transit Dist., 614 A.2d 831 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Saunders v. KDFBS, LLC (conn, 2020-05-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Saunders v. KDFBS, LLC
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
Milne, supra, § 7-17:2, p. 514; see Voluntown v. Rytman, 27 Conn. App. 549, 556 , 607 A.2d 896 (‘‘[a] foreclosure by sale furnishes conflicting claimants an ideal forum for litigating their differences without prejudicing prior encumbrancers’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992); see also Mortgage Electronic Regis- tration Systems, Inc. v. White, supra, 278 Conn. 230 (‘‘[T]he estate that passes by committee deed to a pur- chaser at a foreclosure sale is no more nor less than the estate that had been held by the mortgagor or lien h…
discussed Cited "see" Ogden v. Zoning Board of Appeals (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zarembski v. Warren, 28 Conn. App. 1, 5 , 609 A.2d 1039 (rejecting plaintiffs’ argument that zoning regulation permitting use of accessory building as residence for up to three full-time employees was vague and unenforceable because it did not define ‘‘full- time employee’’), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 918 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" Ocwen Federal Bank v. Busby, No. Cv 98 0166790 S (Jan. 26, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Voluntown v. Rytman , 27 Conn. App. 549 , 556 . 607 A.2d 896 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992). 8 CT Page 1671 Because the court may order payment to an encumbrancer of record only "to the extend there is no controversy"; id.; the court did not violate the statute by disregarding Cooke's affidavit based on its determination that Cooke had improperly filed its affidavit. 9 Cooke may question the soundness of the court's factual finding or legal conclusion, but there is no evidence to support its claim that the court violated the statute.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Town of Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
As this court repeatedly has recognized, "a zoning regulation is [not] necessarily vague because it contains a term that is not defined." Ogden v. Zoning Board of Appeals , supra, 157 Conn. App. at 669-70 , 117 A.3d 986 ; see also Zarembski v. Warren , 28 Conn. App. 1 , 5, 609 A.2d 1039 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 918 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Citibank, N.A. v. Lindland
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moran v. Momeau, supra, 129 Conn. App. 356 -57; see also Voluntown v. Rytman, 27 Conn. App. 549, 553 , 607 A.2d 896 (noting that, when purchase price exceeded recorded liens, proceeds from sale could pay encumbrancers and foreclosed former owner), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992); D.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kroll v. Mazda Motor of America Inc., No. Cv 97-0060070s (Mar. 27, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 1988) § 7.16.5; see also Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc. , 27 Conn. App. 688 , 697 , 610 A.2d 684 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Scap Motors v. Pevco Systems Intl., No. Cv97 034 84 61 S (Aug. 12, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See General Statutes § 42a-2-102 ; see also Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc. , 27 Conn. App. 688 , 693 , 610 A.2d 684 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992) (where case involves sale of goods, it is governed by Article 2 of the UCC); Roy v. Stephen Pontiac-Cadillac.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ciarlelli v. Romeo
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
LaPlante, Connecticut Evidence (2d Ed. 1988) § 7.16.5; see also Sun Hill Industries, Inc. v. Kraftsman Group, Inc., 27 Conn. App. 688, 697 , 610 A.2d 684 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 913 , 614 A.2d 831 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yellow Cab Company
v.
Greater Hartford Transit District
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
614 A.2d 831
Julia Morris Paul, in support of the petition., Glenn E. Brace and M. Katherine Bertini, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 920, is denied.