green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“parties may alter any term of an existing contract by entering into a subsequent contract. . . .”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mercantile Bank v. Hurowitz, No. Cv 95 0381091 S (May 2, 2000)
parties may alter any term of an existing contract by entering into a subsequent contract. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Papandrea
(2×)
See State v. Varszegi, 33 Conn. App. 368, 372-74 , 635 A.2d 816 (1993), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 921 , 636 A.2d 851 (1994). 1 Not surprisingly, there is no direct evidence of intent in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hawkins
(2×)
See State v. Chapman, 33 Conn. App. 205, 212 , 635 A.2d 290 (1993), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 920 , 636 A.2d 851 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prudential Connecticut Realty v. Donofrio, No. 32 52 94 (Jul. 30, 1997)
See Spicer CT Page 8005 v. Spicer, 33 Conn. App. 152 , 157-59 (1993), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 920 (1994); Ruwet-Sibley Equipment Corporation v. Stebbins, 15 Conn. App. 21 , 26 , cert. dismissed, 209 Conn. 806 (1988); Manzin v. United Bank Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513 , 516 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Varszegi
See State v. Varszegi, 33 Conn. App. 368, 375 , 635 A.2d 816 (1993), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 921 , 636 A.2d 851 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
The state also concedes that ‘‘[o]ne who takes property in good faith, under fair color of claim or title, honestly believing that . . . he has a right to take it, is not guilty of larceny even though he is mistaken in such belief, since in such case the felonious intent is lacking.’’ (Inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Varszegi, 33 Conn. App. 368, 373 , 635 A.2d 816 (1993), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 921 , 636 A.2d 851 (1994); see also id., 374 ‘‘([i]f a person takes property in the honest, though mistaken belief, that he has a right to do so, he has not committed larceny�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Barber
See also State v. Haselman, 33 Conn. App. 242, 244-45 , 635 A.2d 310 (1993), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 921 , 636 A.2d 851 (1994); State v. DesLaurier, 32 Conn. App. 553, 562-65 , 630 A.2d 119 (1993), aff'd, 230 Conn. 572 , 646 A.2d 108 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Donald L. Chapman
v.
Donald L. Chapman
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 27, 1994.
Ira B. Grudberg and William M. Bloss, in support of the petition., Lawrence J. Tytla, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 205 (AC 11692), is denied.