Rana v. Ritacco, 655 A.2d 261 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Rana v. Ritacco, 655 A.2d 261 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ross (conn, 2004-06-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ross
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Mozell, 36 Conn. App. 631, 633 , 652 A.2d 1038 (1995) (trial court’s failure to excuse two venirepersons for cause did not deprive defendant of fair and impartial jury because no juror was forced on defendant who “did not request an additional peremptory challenge to exercise against any of the seated jurors nor was there any indication that the defendant would have used a peremptory challenge against any of them if one had been available”), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 917 , 655 A.2d 261 (1995); Johnson v. State, 43 S.W.3d 1, 7 (Tex. Crim.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barbara L. Rana
v.
Frank Ritacco
SC 15214.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 9, 1995.
655 A.2d 261
Karen M. Woods, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 635 (AC 12816), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the plaintiff’s notice to her employer comply with the requirements of General Statutes § 31-293?”