green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashmore v. Hartford Hospital
(2×)
See Shegog v. Zabrecky , 36 Conn. App. 737 , 752, 654 A.2d 771 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 922 , 656 A.2d 670 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
DiNapoli v. Regenstein
See id., at 746-47 , 654 A.2d 771 (explaining three exceptions to rule requiring expert testimony to prove causation).
cited
Cited "see"
Milliun v. New Milford Hospital
See Shegog v. Zabrecky, 36 Conn. App. 737, 750 , 654 A.2d 771 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 922 , 656 A.2d 670 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Drew v. William W. Backus Hospital
See Shegog v. Zabrecky, 36 Conn. App. 737, 745-46 , 654 A.2d 771 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 922 , 656 A.2d 670 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. Hartford Hospital
See Shegog v. Zabrecky, 36 Conn. App. 737, 746-47 , 654 A.2d 771 , cert, denied, 232 Conn. 922 , 656 A.2d 670 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sinclair v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., No. Cv 00 0062320 S (Apr. 25, 2000)
Expert testimony is required in medical malpractice cases because "the lay person, including the members of the jury and the presiding judge, [do] not and can not have the requisite knowledge as to whether proper treatment was given, proper procedure was followed, or CT Page 4867 proper care was used." Fitzmaurice v. Flynn, 167 Conn. 609 , 617 , 356 A.2d 887 (1975); see also Shegog v. Zabrecky, 36 Conn. App. 737 , 745-46 , 654 A.2d 771 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 922 , 656 A.2d 670 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Michael Person
v.
Michael Person
SC 15228.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 1995.
Donald Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition., David J. Sheldon, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 448 (AC 13336), is granted, limited to the following issue:
[*920] Decided March 23, 1995 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15228. Donald Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition. David J. Sheldon, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was not entitled to an instruction on the defense of extreme emotional disturbance?”