green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 ·
…we look to the substance of the claim rather than the form
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lasky v. Pivnick, No. Fa00 037 28 95 S (May 25, 2000)
we look to the substance of the claim rather than the form
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lasky v. Pivnick
we look to the substance of the claim rather than the form
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stebbins v. Stebbins, No. Fa-96-0154797 (May 11, 2000)
we look to the substance of the claim rather than the form
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmington-Girard, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Comm'r of Hartford
Although the plaintiff cites cases that state that the commission has the discretion to proceed on an application, when, notably, the regulations did not require additional information; see Woodburn v. Conservation Commission , 37 Conn. App. 166 , 179, 655 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 233 Conn. 906 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995) ; or that the commission was not prohibited by the regulations from holding a hearing on an incomplete application; see Michel v. Planning & Zoning Commission , 28 Conn. App. 314 , 331, 612 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 923 , 614 A.2d 824 (1992) ; the cases the plaintiff cites…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Beckerman
See Whalen v. Ives, 37 Conn. App. 7, 16 , 654 A.2d 798 (we look to substance of claim rather than form), cert. denied, 233 Conn. 905 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
People's United Bank v. Bok
(2×)
See Whalen v. Ives, 37 Conn. App. 7, 15-16 , 654 A.2d 798 , cert. denied, 233 Conn. 905 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Avalonbay Comm. v. Wilton Inland Wet., No. Hhb Cv00-0502146 (Jan. 7, 2002)
See General Statutes § 22a-42a ." Woodburn v. Conservation Commission, 37 Conn. App. 166 , 170 , 655 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 233 Conn. 906 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Avalonbay Comm. v. Wilton Inland, No. Hhb Cv00 050 21 46 (Sep. 6, 2001) Ct Page 12587
See General Statutes § 22a-42a ." Woodburn v. Conservation Commission , 37 Conn. App. 166 , 170 , 655 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 233 Conn. 906 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
CAS Construction Co. v. Dainty Rubbish Service, Inc.
See Whalen v. Ives, 37 Conn. App. 7 [ 654 A.2d 798 , cert. denied, 233 Conn. 905 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995)].” On October 24, 1997, the defendant moved to reconsider and reargue the sustaining of the plaintiffs objection to its request to revise in light of the fact that the defendant had moved to open the default, although the trial court was unaware of that fact.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nazarko v. Zoning Commission
“There is no requirement that the published notice describe the proposed action in detail or with exactitude.” Welles v. East Windsor, 185 Conn. 556, 559 , 441 A.2d 174 (1981); see Woodbum v. Conservation Commission, 37 Conn. App. 166, 178 , 655 A.2d 764 , cert, denied, 233 Conn. 906 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cocchia v. Testa
We agree with the plaintiff. ‘‘In certain circumstances, this court previously has looked beyond the label of a motion to reclassify it when its substance did not reflect the label applied by the moving party.’’ Santorso v. Bristol Hospital, 308 Conn. 338 , 351, 63 A.3d 940 (2013); see also Whalen v. Ives, 37 Conn. App. 7, 17 , 654 A.2d 798 (functional effect of motion was determinative), cert. denied, 233 Conn. 905 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bower v. D'Onfro
See Labbe v. Pension Commission, 229 Conn. 801, 815, 643 A.2d 1268 (1994); Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 209 Conn. 544 , 547 n.l, 522 A.2d 796 (1989); see also Whalen v. Ives, 37 Conn. App. 7, 15 , 654 A.2d 798 , cert, denied, 233 Conn. 905 , 657 A.2d 645 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel J. Whalen
v.
Milton E. Ives, Sr.
v.
Milton E. Ives, Sr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 24, 1995.
Wesley W. Horton, Christy Scott and Kevin C. Connors, in support of the petition., Daniel J. Whalen, pro se, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (3)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 7 (AC 12764), is denied.