Carr v. S. New England Tel. Co., 659 A.2d 183 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Carr v. S. New England Tel. Co., 659 A.2d 183 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Papineau (connappct, 2018-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Papineau
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Finally, [b]ecause direct evidence of the accused's state of mind is rarely available ... intent is often inferred from conduct ... and from the cumulative effect of the circumstantial evidence and the rational inferences drawn therefrom." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Danforth , 315 Conn. 518 , 532-33, 108 A.3d 1060 (2015) ; see also State v. Smith , 36 Conn. App. 483 , 486, 651 A.2d 744 (1994) (sufficient for state to demonstrate that actors mutually agreed to commit forbidden act), cert. denied, 233 Conn. 910 , 659 A.2d 184 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Corine Carr
v.
Southern New England Telephone Company
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 15, 1995.
659 A.2d 183
Corine Carr, pro se, in support of the petition., Stephen G. Ekern, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14126) is denied.