Oakley v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 665 A.2d 609 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Oakley v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 665 A.2d 609 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“ven if a court finds that the police expressly informed witnesses that the defendant would be in the array, our courts have found the identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive only when other factors exist that otherwise emphasize the defendant's photograph”
55 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Reid (conn, 2000-09-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Reid
Conn. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ven if a court finds that the police expressly informed witnesses that the defendant would be in the array, our courts have found the identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive only when other factors exist that otherwise emphasize the defendant's photograph
cited Cited "see" State v. Perez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Owens , 38 Conn.App. 801 , 804-805, 663 A.2d 1094 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912 , 665 A.2d 609 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Marquez (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Reid, supra, 254 Conn. at 556 , 757 A.2d 482 . "[E]ven if a court finds that the police expressly informed witnesses that the defendant would be in the array, our courts have found the identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive only when other factors exist that otherwise emphasize the defendant's photograph." State v. Owens, 38 Conn.App. 801, 811 , 663 A.2d 1094 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912 , 665 A.2d 609 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Weigold v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Milford Savings Bank v. Roina, 38 Conn. App. 240, 244 , 659 A.2d 1226 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 915 , 665 A.2d 609 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Carr v. Thames Automation, Inc., No. 549690 (Sep. 9, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Milford Savings Bank v. Roina, 38 Conn. App. 240 , 245 , 659 A.2d 1226 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 915 , 665 A.2d 609 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Connecticut National Bank v. Rytman
Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Milford Savings Bank v. Roina, 38 Conn. App. 240, 242 , 659 A.2d 1226 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 915 , 665 A.2d 609 (1995); but see footnote 16.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jenkins (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
"We . . . may resort to the evidence produced in support of the court's ruling on a suppression motion when, as here, the court does not make detailed factual findings to support its decision." State v. MacNeil, 28 Conn.App. 508, 515 , 613 A.2d 296 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 901 , 615 A.2d 1044 (1992); see also State v. Owens, 38 Conn.App. 801, 805 , 663 A.2d 1094 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912 , 665 A.2d 609 (1995); State v. Zayas, 3 Conn.App. 289 , 298 n. 11, 489 A.2d 380 , cert. denied, 195 Conn. 803 , 491 A.2d 1104 (1985); State v. Martin, 2 Conn.App. 605, 614 , 482 A.2d 70 (1984), cert. den…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BARBARA OAKLEY
v.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
SC 15316.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 28, 1995.
665 A.2d 609
Charles Krich, staff attorney, in support of the petition., A. Susan Peck, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 69%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 506 (AC 12900), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the Superior Court had jurisdiction to consider the plaintiffs motion for fees and expenses under General Statutes § 4-184a?”