State v. Casado, 682 A.2d 1006 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Casado, 682 A.2d 1006 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“mere assertion by the defendant that the plea was involuntary . . . does not entitle to withdraw the plea, nor does it require ... an evidentiary hearing on the motion to withdraw”
25 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Johnson (conn, 2000-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Johnson
Conn. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
mere assertion by the defendant that the plea was involuntary . . . does not entitle to withdraw the plea, nor does it require ... an evidentiary hearing on the motion to withdraw
cited Cited "see" State v. Irala
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Casado, 42 Conn. App. 371, 375 , 680 A.2d 981 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 920 , 682 A.2d 1006 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Barnwell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
As we have noted, the defendant affirmatively indicated *264 that he was satisfied with his counsel’s representation. 8 This court has stated that “a trial court . . . may properly rely on . . . the responses of the [defendant] at the time he responded to the trial court’s plea canvass . . . .” Bowers v. Warden, 19 Conn. App. 440, 443 , 562 A.2d 588 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 817 , 565 A.2d 534 (1989); see also State v. Casado, 42 Conn. App. 371, 377-78 , 680 A.2d 981 (in denying request for evidentiary hearing, court properly relied on defendant’s representation during plea proceedin…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Silva
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well established that “ [a] trial court ‘may properly rely on . . . the responses of the [defendant] at the time [she] responded to the trial court’s plea canvass . . . .’ Bowers v. Warden, [supra, 19 Conn. App. 443 ]; see also State v. Williams, 203 Conn. 159, 170 , 523 A.2d 1284 (1987).” State v. Casado, 42 Conn. App. 371, 377 , 680 A.2d 981 (trial court properly relied on defendant’s representations that she was not forced into entering plea), cert, denied, 239 Conn. 920 , 682 A.2d 1006 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
CARMEN CASADO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 1996.
682 A.2d 1006
Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition., LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Berdon.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 371 (AC 15039), is denied.

Dissent

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.