Colonial Penn Ins. v. Bryant, 701 A.2d 340 (Conn. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Colonial Penn Ins. v. Bryant, 701 A.2d 340 (Conn. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
D. EUGENE BRYANT D. EUGENE BRYANT v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY D. EUGENE BRYANT v. COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY
SC 15778.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 24, 1997.
701 A.2d 340
Constance L. Epstein, in support of the petition., Frederick L. Murolo and Jeffrey L. Fisher, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The Royal Insurance Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 558 (AC 15518/15519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (a) (2), and Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasion, 219 Conn. 764 (1991), the signature of the defendant, D. Eugene Bryant, was sufficient to render the reduction in coverage form effective as to him; and (2) the subsequent amendment to § 38-175c (a) (2), and codified at General Statutes § 38a-336 (a) (2), clarified § 38-175c (a) (2), with retroactive effect?”

BERDON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.