Demaria v. Demaria, 714 A.2d 9 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Demaria v. Demaria, 714 A.2d 9 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: O'Rourke v. Lahda, No. Cv98-0487915s (Sep. 22, 2000) (connsuperct, 2000-09-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" O'Rourke v. Lahda, No. Cv98-0487915s (Sep. 22, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital, CT Page 12097 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000): "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski, 206 Conn. 495 , 500 . 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Lovell v. St. John the Apostle Church, No. Cv97-0057100s (May 9, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000). "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski , 206 Conn. 495 , 500 , 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. , 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Simonin v. Szymanski, No. Cv98-0491012s (May 18, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the CT Page 6589 nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000). "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski , 206 Conn. 495 , 500 , 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see also Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. , 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Watts v. McCann, No. Cv98-0485747s (May 15, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000). "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski , 206 Conn. 495 , 500 , 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see also Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. , 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EILEEN DEMARIA
v.
JOSEPH L. DEMARIA
SC 15912.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 15, 1998.
714 A.2d 9
David P. Ball, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 729 (AC 17025), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly render a judgment terminating alimony to a cohabiting spouse where there was no showing that the cohabiting spouse’s financial needs had changed?”