green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Rourke v. Lahda, No. Cv98-0487915s (Sep. 22, 2000)
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital, CT Page 12097 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000): "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski, 206 Conn. 495 , 500 . 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lovell v. St. John the Apostle Church, No. Cv97-0057100s (May 9, 2000)
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000). "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski , 206 Conn. 495 , 500 , 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. , 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simonin v. Szymanski, No. Cv98-0491012s (May 18, 2000)
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the CT Page 6589 nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000). "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski , 206 Conn. 495 , 500 , 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see also Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. , 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watts v. McCann, No. Cv98-0485747s (May 15, 2000)
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , 252 Conn. 193 , 201 , 746 A.2d 730 (2000). "[T]he court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist." Nolan v. Borkowski , 206 Conn. 495 , 500 , 538 A.2d 1031 (1988); see also Dubinsky v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. , 48 Conn. App. 52 , 55 , 708 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 926 , 714 A.2d 9 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EILEEN DEMARIA
v.
JOSEPH L. DEMARIA
v.
JOSEPH L. DEMARIA
SC 15912.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 15, 1998.
David P. Ball, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 729 (AC 17025), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly render a judgment terminating alimony to a cohabiting spouse where there was no showing that the cohabiting spouse’s financial needs had changed?”