green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.2 score
“the weight of evidence and the credibility of witnesses was for the jury to determine, and, therefore, we will not disturb the jury's verdict.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ralston v. Stop and Shop Companies, No. Cv98-026 58 25 S (Nov. 8, 2000)
the weight of evidence and the credibility of witnesses was for the jury to determine, and, therefore, we will not disturb the jury's verdict.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Correction
In 1996, following a jury trial, the petitioner was convicted of murder, conspiracy to commit murder and larceny in the first degree in connection with the killing of the victim, Angel Soto.2 Because the evidence underlying that conviction is highly relevant to the petitioner’s claim that his trial counsel’s performance was constitu- tionally defective, we set forth the facts that the jury reasonably could have found, as recited in the opinion of the Appellate Court in his direct appeal; see State v. Sanchez, 50 Conn. App. 145 , 718 A.2d 52 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 922 , 722 A.2d 811 (199…
discussed
Cited "see"
Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. Partnership
See Mattegat v. Klopfenstein, 50 Conn. App. 97, 106-108 , 717 A.2d 276 (concluding that estimated repair costs used by court to determine damages rather than diminution in value was appropriate measure of damages for negligence claim based on damage to real estate), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 922 , 722 A.2d 810 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Colon, No. Cr 98-270986t (Sep. 6, 2000)
The reasonableness of a police officer's determination that an emergency exists is evaluated on the basis of facts known at the time of entry . ." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Blades , 225 Conn. 609 , 618-19 ; see also State v. Hoth , 50 Conn. App. 77 , 84 , 718 A.2d 28 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 922 , 722 A.2d 811 (1998) Lt.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
CRAIG HOTH
v.
CRAIG HOTH
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 8, 1998.
Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Paul J. Ferencek, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 77 (AC 17615), is denied.
Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Paul J. Ferencek, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 8, 1998