green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. James
See State v. Rolli, 53 Conn. App. 269, 281 , 729 A.2d 245 (counsel properly may appeal to jury’s common sense in closing remarks), cert. denied, 249 Conn. 926 , 733 A.2d 850 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bothwell
See State v. Rolli, 53 Conn. App. 269, 281 , 729 A.2d 245 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 926 , 733 A.2d 850 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Singh
See State v. Rolli, 53 Conn. App. 269, 281 , 729 A.2d 245 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 926 , 733 A.2d 850 (1999) (argument properly appealed to jury’s common sense); A.B.A., supra, standard 3-5.9, p. 109 (stating that counsel may argue facts outside record if “matters of common public knowledge based on ordinary human experience”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
We cannot say that in the context of the entire trial; see State v. Rolli, 53 Conn. App. 269,279 , 729 A.2d 245 , cert, denied, 249 Conn. 926 , 733 A.2d 850 (1999); that the defendant met his burden of proving that the prosecutor’s closing argument deprived him of a fair trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rivera
In the present case, even if we were to consider, as the defendant suggests, the prosecutor’s remark along with the defendant’s other unpreserved claims of inappropriate comments by the prosecutor, we cannot say that in the context of the entire trial; see State v. Rolli, 53 Conn. App. 269, 279 , 729 A.2d 245 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 926 , 733 A.2d 850 (1999); that the defendant met her burden of proving that the argument deprived her of a fair trial.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Banks
See State v. Rolli, 53 Conn. App. 269, 281 , 729 A.2d 245 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 926 , 733 A.2d 850 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Girouard Associates, Inc., No. Cv 99 0171693 S (Feb. 22, 2000)
See Appleton v. Board of Education , 53 Conn. App. 252 , 263-66 , 730 A.2d 88 (1999), cert. granted, 249 Conn. 927 , ___ A.2d ___ (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WILLIAM H. WILSON
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GRANBY
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GRANBY
SC 16136.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 30, 1999.
Fatima T. Lobo, in support of the petition.
Palmer.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 53 Conn. App. 182 (AC 17796), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that failure of the planning and zoning commission to comply with General Statutes § 8-3 (d) did not render the commission’s decision null and void?”
PALMER, J.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Fatima T. Lobo, in support of the petition. Decided June 30, 1999