Veal v. Comm'r of Corr., 738 A.2d 1094 (Conn. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Veal v. Comm'r of Corr., 738 A.2d 1094 (Conn. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Tutson v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2016-09-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Tutson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
In recalling a conversation with the petitioner's trial counsel, who was inquiring whether Rooty could "recollect anything about that day," Rooty testified that she replied to this inquiry that she "really just didn't know besides [stating to the petitioner's trial counsel] that [she and the petitioner] spent a lot of time together, so, as far as the exact date of everything that happened, that so much had happened in [her] life, [she] couldn't really recall that." On cross-examination, when pressed on her recollection of the timeline of events, she acknowledged that "the dates that were being…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SAMUEL VEAL
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 29, 1999.
738 A.2d 1094
David B. Rozwaski, in support of the petition., Denise B. Smoker, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Berdon.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

The petitioner Samuel Veal’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 384 (AC 18367), is denied.

Dissent

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the petitioner Samuel Veal’s petition for certification to appeal.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.