Benedetto v. Benedetto, 744 A.2d 437 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Benedetto v. Benedetto, 744 A.2d 437 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Cator (conn, 2001-07-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cator
Conn. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
The defendant seeks review of this issue under the doctrine of plain error. 13 “We consistently have stated that review under the plain error doctrine is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stephens, 249 Conn. 288, 291 , 734 A.2d 533 (1999); see State v. Niemeyer, 55 Conn. App. 447, 457-58 , 740 A.2d 416 , cert. granted on other grounds, 252 Conn. 916 , 747 A.2d 517 , cert. granted on other grou…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROBERTA BENEDETTO
v.
SILVIO BENEDETTO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 19, 2000.
744 A.2d 437
James H. Lee, in support of the petition., Jocelyn B. Hurwitz, in opposition.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 350 (AC 17575), is denied.