green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cator
The defendant seeks review of this issue under the doctrine of plain error. 13 “We consistently have stated that review under the plain error doctrine is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stephens, 249 Conn. 288, 291 , 734 A.2d 533 (1999); see State v. Niemeyer, 55 Conn. App. 447, 457-58 , 740 A.2d 416 , cert. granted on other grounds, 252 Conn. 916 , 747 A.2d 517 , cert. granted on other grou…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dwyer
See Practice Book § 60-5. 13 “[R]eview under the plain error doctrine is reserved for truly extraordinary situations where the existence of the error is so obvious that it affects the fairness and integrity of and public confidence in the judicial proceedings.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Niemeyer, 55 Conn. App. 447, 457-58 , 740 A.2d 416 , cert. granted on other grounds, 252 Conn. 916 , 917, 744 A.2d 437 , 747 A.2d 517 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lambert
See State v. Mann, 56 Conn. App. 856, 857 , 747 A.2d 19 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 906 , 753 A.2d 941 (2000); see Baughman v. Collins, 56 Conn. App. 34, 35 , 740 A.2d 491 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 747 A.2d 517 (2000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. JOSE G.
Prescott, Connecticut Evidence (4th Ed. 2008) § 8.2.2, p. 461; see, e.g., Baughman v. Collins, 56 Conn. App. 34, 39 , 740 A.2d 491 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 747 A.2d 517 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
See State v. Mann, 56 Conn. App. 856, 857 , 747 A.2d 19 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 906 , 753 A.2d 941 (2000); see also Baughman v. Collins, 56 Conn. App. 34, 35 , 740 A.2d 491 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 747 A.2d 517 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUZANNE BAUGHMAN
v.
PATRICK COLLINS
v.
PATRICK COLLINS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 2, 2000.
M. Jeffry Spahr, in support of the petition., Robert G. Golger, in opposition.
Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 34 (AC 18496), is denied.