Stewart v. Stewart, 755 A.2d 216 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Stewart v. Stewart, 755 A.2d 216 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thomas v. Primus (connappct, 2014-02-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Thomas v. Primus
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See D’Addario v. Truskoski, 57 Conn. App. 236, 247 , 749 A.2d 38 (recognizing easement by necessity created by state taking and natural disaster), cert. denied, 253 Conn. 918 , 755 A.2d 214 (2000); see also Pender v. Matranga, 58 Conn. App. 19, 26 , 752 A.2d 77 (2000) (“[a]n easement of necessity may occur when a parcel has become landlocked from outside access such that the owner would have no reasonable means of ingress or egress except over lands promised by another and a right-of-way is necessary for the enjoyment of the parcel”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mystic Oil Co. v. Shaukat, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ninth RMA Partners, L.P. v. Krass, 57 Conn. App. 1 , 3–5, 746 A.2d 826 (defen- dants improperly raised issue of liability at hearing in damages following summary judgment as to liability only rendered following defendants’ concession as to liability), cert. denied, 253 Conn. 918 , 755 A.2d 215 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Citibank, N.A. v. Stein
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
"Consistent with these provisions, our appellate case law has recognized that, to enforce a note, one need not be the owner of the note; see, e.g., Ninth RMA Partners, L.P. v. Krass , 57 Conn. App. 1 , 7, 746 A.2d 826 ... cert. denied, 253 Conn. 918 , 755 A.2d 215 (2000) ; or even the holder of the note.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Deane v. Kahn, No. 559712 (May 9, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 37 . "[T]he circumstances of the case [must be] such that the means of access available [across his own land] would not afford the landowner any real beneficial enjoyment of his property." Id.; see also D'Addario v. Truskoski , 57 Conn. App. 236 , 246 , 749 A.2d 38 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 918 , 755 A.2d 214 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DELORES D. STEWART
v.
LEROY STEWART
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 19, 2000.
755 A.2d 216
Delores D. Stewart, pro se, in support of the petition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 335 (AC 17791/ AC 18086), is denied.