Johnson v. Town of North Branford, 783 A.2d 1028 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Johnson v. Town of North Branford, 783 A.2d 1028 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …that the clear intent of the legislature in conferring the power to sanction on local zoning authorities is prima facie evidence that those daily fine sanctions are civil, and not criminal, in nature ⚠ not in text
80 citation events (80 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Baker (connappct, 2016-09-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Baker (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
that the clear intent of the legislature in conferring the power to sanction on local zoning authorities is prima facie evidence that those daily fine sanctions are civil, and not criminal, in nature
discussed Cited "see" Sinotte v. City of Waterbury (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. North Branford, 64 Conn. App. 643 , *430 646-48, 781 A.2d 346 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 926 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Quint
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Malloy v. Town of Colchester (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gelinas v. West Hartford, 65 Conn. App. 265, 275 , 782 A.2d 679 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 926 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (2×)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
A penalty is “a sum of money [for] which the law exacts payment by way of punishment for . . . not doing some act which is required to be done.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Davis v. Forman School, 54 Conn. App. 841, 851 , 738 A.2d 697 (1999), quoting Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Ed. 1990); see Gelinas v. West Hartford, 65 Conn. App. 265 , 782 A.2d 679 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 926 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001). 5 Such statutes are strictly construed against those seeking to impose the penalty and in favor of those on whom such penalties would be imposed.
discussed Cited "see" Durso v. Vessichio (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gelinas v. West Hartford, 65 Conn. App. 265, 275 , 782 A.2d 679 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 926 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Porter
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mincewicz, 64 Conn. App. 687, 693 , 781 A.2d 455 (for purposes of double jeopardy, greater offense is same offense as any lesser included offense, and vice versa, and imposition of multiple punishments for both offenses violates double jeopardy prohibitions of state, federal constitutions), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 924 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. McCown
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mincewicz, 64 Conn. App. 687, 696 , 781 A.2d 455 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 924 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." A & M Towing & Recovery, Inc. v. Guay (2×)
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gelinas v. West Hartford, 65 Conn. App. 265, 284-85 , 782 A.2d 679 (affirming imposition of fines in favor of municipal zoning agency for, inter alia, use of property without certificate of occupancy), cert, denied, 258 Conn. 926 , 783 A.2d 1028 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAVID JOHNSON
v.
TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2001.
783 A.2d 1028
William S. Palmieri, in support of the petition., Stephen J. Courtney, in opposition.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (2)

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 643 (AC 19891), is denied.