green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cox
See State v. McCall, 62 Conn. App. 161, 169 , 780 A.2d 134 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 935 , 785 A.2d 231 , cert. dismissed, 258 Conn. 935 , 785 A.2d 232 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Caruso v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Caruso v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 150 Conn. App. 841 . 12 The plaintiffs also reassert several arguments that they made to the trial court and the Appellate Court, including: (1) that the board failed to make the required findings for granting a variance under § 213-59 (C) of the regula- tions; see footnote 13 of this opinion; (2) that the variance impairs the comprehensive zoning plan; (3) that the purchaser with knowledge rule bars the defendant’s variance application; see, e.g., Kalimian v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 65 Conn. App. 628 , 632–33, 783 A.2d 506 (property owner barred…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ELIAS KALIMIAN, TRUSTEE
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF NORWICH
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF NORWICH
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 31, 2001.
Adam A. Ldben, in support of the petition., Bruce G. MacDermid, in opposition.
Published
The petition by the defendant Steven Brenneisen for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 628 (AC 20882), is denied.