green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction
Because it is pri- marily the responsibility of defense counsel to advise the defendant of his right to testify and thereby to ensure that the right is protected, we believe the appro- priate vehicle for claims that the defendant’s right to testify was violated by defense counsel is [through] a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel [pursuant to] Strickland v. Washington, [supra] 466 U.S. 668 . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Commissioner of Correction v. Rodriquez, 222 Conn. 469, 476 , 610 A.2d 631 (1992); see also Braham v. Commissioner of Cor- rection, 72 Conn. App. 1 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Langston v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Langston, 67 Conn. App. 903 , 786 A.2d 547 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 916 , 792 A.2d 852 (2002). *212 The petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in April, 2002, in which he alleged that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on numerous grounds.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conde v. Commissioner of Correction
The reasonableness of an investigation must be evaluated not through hindsight but from the perspective of the attorney when he was conducting it.” State v. Talton, 197 Conn. 280, 297-98 , 497 A.2d 35 (1985); see also Tatum v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 61, 66 , 783 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 937 , 785 A.2d 232 (2001). “[T]here is a strong presumption that the trial strategy employed by a criminal defendant’s counsel is reasonable and is a result of the exercise of professional judgment . . . .” (Citation omitted.) Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction, 67 Conn.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
RICHARD LANGSTON
v.
RICHARD LANGSTON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 17, 2002.
Carlos E. Candal, special public defender, in support of the petition., Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 903 (AC 19960), is denied.