green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kraiza v. Planning & Zoning Commission
(2×)
See Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 67 Conn. App. 597, 605 , 789 A.2d 478 (language of regulation construed so no clause or provision considered superfluous, void or insignificant), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 901 , 793 A.2d 1088 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Vivian v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 67 Conn. App. 597 , 789 A.2d 478 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 901 , 793 A.2d 1088 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC
Our Supreme Court has explained that "although [the] court is not bound by a zoning board's interpretation of its regulations, a board's reasonable, time-tested interpretation is given great weight." Jalowiec Realty Associates, L.P. v. Planning & Zoning Commission , 278 Conn. 408 , 414, 898 A.2d 157 (2006) ; see also Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 67 Conn. App. 597 , 604, 789 A.2d 478 (although not binding, "[i]f a board's time-tested interpretation of a regulation is reasonable ... that interpretation should be accorded great weight by the courts"), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 901 , 793 A.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals
“The burden of proof to demonstrate that the board acted improperly is upon the party seeking to overturn the board’s decision [in this case, the plaintiffs].” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 218 Conn. 265, 269-70 , 588 A.2d 1372 (1991); see also Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 67 Conn. App. 597, 603 , 789 A.2d 478 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 901 , 793 A.2d 1088 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, RECEIVER OF FIRST CONSTITUTION BANK
v.
JOSEPH M. CALDRELLO
v.
JOSEPH M. CALDRELLO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2002.
Richard D. Haviland, in support of the petition., Donald E. Frechette, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The petition for certification by the defendants Joseph M. Caldrello and Sandra V. Caldrello for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 68 (AC 20144), is denied.