green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349 , 350 n.1, 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002); see also State v. Webb, 238 Conn. 389 , 468 n.56, 680 A.2d 147 (1996), aff'd after remand, 252 Conn. 128 , 750 A.2d 448 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 835 , 121 S. Ct. 93 , 148 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nunez
See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349, 355 , 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002). 2 Regarding the other Asherman factors, there was no likelihood of mistaken interpretation by the jury because the defendant offered evidence on the issue and argued an adverse inference against the state in his closing argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Mattson v. Mattson
See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349, 355 , 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Henry
See Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349, 355 , 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A. 2d 48 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Konefal v. Konefal
See, e.g., Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349 , 350 n.1, 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002). “[W]e are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rocque v. DeMilo and Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Legnos v. Legnos, 70 Conn. App. 349 , 350 n.1, 797 A.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 911 , 806 A.2d 48 (2002). 7 During the pendency of this appeal, the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the same mootness grounds.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOSEPH CALDRELLO
v.
CITY OF NEW LONDON
v.
CITY OF NEW LONDON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 17, 2002.
Richard D. Haviland, in support of the petition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 901 (AC 21609), is denied.
SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.