green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lawson
See State v. Dubose, 75 Conn. App. 163, 174 , 815 A.2d 213 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 909 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Young
(4×)
See, e.g., State v. Francis D. , 75 Conn.App. 1 , 11, 815 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 909 , 819 A.2d 842 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Simpson
(2×)
The court was well within its discretion to consider the victim’s testimony both inconsistent with her prior statements and evasive.” (Emphasis added.) Id.; see also State v. Francis D., 75 Conn. App. 1, 18 , 815 A.2d 191 (“[t]he victim’s inability to recall material facts . . . clearly satisfies the inconsistency element” of Whelan), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 909 , 819 A.2d 842 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bunker
Whether it was prior or subsequent misconduct has no bearing on its admissibility.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Labbe, 61 Conn. App. 490, 495 , 767 A.2d 124 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 914 , 773 A.2d 945 (2001); see also State v. Sawyer, 74 Conn. App. 743 , 749 n.13, 813 A.2d 1073 (whether evidence of other misconduct occurred prior to or subsequent to crimes with which defendant charged had no bearing on admis sibility), cert. granted on other grounds, 263 Conn. 908 , 819 A.2d 842 (2003); State v. Lepri, 56 Conn. App. 403, 409 , 743 A.2d 626 (rejecting claim that court improperly admitted subs…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. James W.
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Francis D., 75 Conn. App. 1, 14-16 , 815 A.2d 191 , cert, denied, 263 Conn. 909 , 819 A.2d 842 (2003); State v. Thompson, 71 Conn. App. 8, 17-23 , 799 A.2d 1126 (2002); State v. Christiano, 29 Conn. App. 642, 649-54 , 617 A.2d 470 (1992), aff'd, 228 Conn. 456 , 637 A.2d 382 , cert, denied, 513 U.S. 821 , 115 S. Ct. 83 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Warren
(2×)
See State v. Morales, 78 Conn. App. 25, 47 , 826 A.2d 217 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 901 , 832 A.2d 67 (2003); see also State v. Francis D., 75 Conn. App. 1, 11 , 815 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 909 , 819 A.2d 842 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
FRANCIS D.
v.
FRANCIS D.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 3, 2003.
Mary Anne Royle, special public defender, in support of the petition., Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 1 (AC 21599), is denied.