Dadi v. Cuginos II Restaurant, 832 A.2d 68 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Dadi v. Cuginos II Restaurant, 832 A.2d 68 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Morikawa v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Weston (connappct, 2011-02-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Morikawa v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Weston
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
We note that in making this argument, the defendants expressly disclaim reliance on the doctrine of municipal estoppel; see Collins Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 78 Conn. App. 561, 575-76 , 827 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 68 (2003); and we express no opinion on that issue. 5 Insofar as the cases cited by the defendants discuss de minimis violations in the context of variances, such discussion almost invariably was relevant to whether the first of the two requirements for a variance was satisfied; that is, whether the variance did not affect substantially the com…
discussed Cited "see" Garlasco v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Collins Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 78 Conn. App. 561, 564 , 827 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 68 (2003). “[C]ourts are not to substitute their judgment for that of the board, and . . . the decisions of local boards will not be disturbed as long as honest judgment has been reasonably and fairly made after a full hearing ....
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cortese v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals, 274 Conn. 411, 418 , 876 A.2d 540 (2005); see also Zoning Commission v. Lescynski, 188 Conn. 724, 731-32 , 453 A.2d 1144 (1982) (municipal estoppel applied with great caution, only when resulting violation has been unjustifiably induced by agent having authority in such matters and when special circumstances make it highly inequitable or oppressive to enforce the regulations). *387 This court has recognized that “[a] claim of municipal estoppel is . . . inherently fact bound.” Collins Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 78 Conn. App. 561, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AHMED A. DADI
v.
CUGINOS II RESTAURANT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 2003.
832 A.2d 68
Ahmed A. Dadi, pro se, in support of the petition., Thomas T. Lonardo, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 403 (AC 22919), is denied.