Lomiento v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins., 851 A.2d 304 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Lomiento v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins., 851 A.2d 304 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Freccia v. Freccia (conn, 2026-05-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Freccia v. Freccia
Conn. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
See Western Boot & Clothing Co. v. L’Enfance Magique, Inc., 81 Conn. App. 486 , 491–92, 840 A.2d 574 (concluding that misnaming of plaintiff in notice to quit did not deprive trial court of subject matter jurisdiction), cert. denied, 269 Conn. 903 , 852 A.2d 737 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Rogers v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Commissioner of Correction, 82 Conn. App. 901 , 846 A.2d 962 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 902 , 851 A.2d 304 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Strano
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Finan, 82 Conn. App. 222, 238 , 843 A.2d 630 , cert. granted on other grounds, 269 Conn. 901 , 851 A.2d 304 (2004). 3 The defendant also argues that the court ignored the fact that the officers made no attempt to investigate his behavior and did not question him about his presence at Thornton’s.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Torgerson v. Kenny
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Torgerson v. Sarah Tuxis Residential Services, Inc., 81 Conn. App. 435 , 840 A.2d 66 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 903 , 852 A.2d 737 (2004), a prior lawsuit in which the plaintiff sought a judicial determination of the nature, extent and location of the right-of-way reserved in the deed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BEATRICE LOMIENTO
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 5, 2004.
851 A.2d 304
Beatrice Lomiento, pro se, in support of the petition., William J. Melley III, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 24713) is denied.