State v. Bloom, 870 A.2d 1081 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Bloom, 870 A.2d 1081 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Valentine v. Valentine (connappct, 2016-04-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Valentine v. Valentine
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hughes v. Hughes, 95 Conn.App. 200 , 207-208, 895 A.2d 274 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 902 , 907 A.2d 90 (2006). "[W]e allow every reasonable presumption ... in favor of the correctness of [the trial court's] action." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Kelman v. Kelman, 86 Conn.App. 120 , 122, 860 A.2d 292 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 911 , 870 A.2d 1079 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Bock v. Bock
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kelman v. Kelman, 86 Conn. App. 120, 125-26 , 860 A.2d 292 (2004), cert, denied, 273 Conn. 911 , 870 A.2d 1079 (2005). 8 In her reply brief, the defendant specifically states that she “is in strong agreement with the plaintiff that . . . ‘the trial court rightly held that the [educational support agreements] of the parties entered by the court did *559 not comply with [§] 46b-56c, and were thus not educational support orders’ ” pursuant to § 46b-56c. 9 Because the defendant does not contest this determination, we do not consider this aspect of the court’s judgment on appeal.
discussed Cited "see" Golden v. Mandel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kelman v. Kelman, 86 Conn. App. 120, 123-24 , 860 A.2d 292 (2004) (where court specifically stated that it took into account relevant statutes, parties’ testimony, financial affidavits, and child support guidelines worksheets, court’s decision was affirmed), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 911 , 870 A.2d 1079 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Loughlin v. Loughlin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kelman v. Kelman, 86 Conn. App. 120, 125-26 , 860 A.2d 292 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 911 , 870 A.2d 1079 (2005). 27 In Wolfburg , this court concluded that an alimony award coextensive with tlie remainder of the minority of the parties’ child was proper because there was evidence that during their marriage, the parties had agreed that the recipient would “shape the time spent in a career or employment to the needs of the family during the minority of the child . . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tilsen v. Benson
Conn. · 2023 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Morris v. Morris, supra, 262 Conn. 306–307 (reversal was required when ‘‘the [trial] court affirmatively and expressly stated that it relied on gross income to determine available funds for support consider- ation,’’ despite evidence in record of parties’ net income, because trial court ‘‘expressly and affirmatively stated that the [husband] ‘has the following gross amounts [that] are properly included in his support income consider- ation’ ’’ (emphasis in original)), Procaccini v. Procaccini, 157 Conn. App. 804 , 808–11, 118 A.3d 112 (2015) (modification of a…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Maturo v. Maturo (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kelman v. Kelman, 86 Conn. App. 120, 123-24 , 860 A.2d 292 (2004) , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 911 , 870 A.2d 1079 (2005) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JEROME H. BLOOM
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2005.
870 A.2d 1081
Jerome H. Bloom, pro se, in support of the petition., Melissa L. Streeto, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 463 (AC 24915), is denied.