green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pierce v. Commissioner of Correction
See McCue v. Birmingham, 88 Conn. App. 630 , 635–36, 870 A.2d 1126 (res judicata/claim preclusion bars any claim that could have been raised in prior proceeding), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 905 , 876 A.2d 14 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silver v. Holtman
See McCue v. Birmingham, 88 Conn. App. 630 , 870 A.2d 1126 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 905 , 876 A.2d 14 (2005). 3 Because, however, Gail McCue was not the affiant and was not named in the affidavit, she does not have standing to pursue this claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., McCue v. Birmingham, 88 Conn. App. 630, 635-36 , 870 A.2d 1126 (res judicata, or claim preclusion, bars any claim that could have been raised in prior proceeding), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 905 , 876 A.2d 14 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROBERT RIGHT
v.
KIMBERLY BREEN
v.
KIMBERLY BREEN
SC 17439.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 7, 2005.
Andrew H. Sharp, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 583 (AC 24613), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was entitled to nominal damages and costs?
“2. If the answer to question one is ‘yes,’ should this court overrule Keller v. Carone, 138 Conn. 405, 85 A.2d 489 (1951)?”