Louis Gherlone Excavating Co. v. McLean Constr. Co., 876 A.2d 1201 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Louis Gherlone Excavating Co. v. McLean Constr. Co., 876 A.2d 1201 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stone-Krete Const. Inc. v. Eder (conn, 2006-12-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Stone-Krete Const. Inc. v. Eder
Conn. · 2006 · confidence medium
Louis Gherlone Excavating, Inc. v. McLean Construction Co., supra, 274 Conn. at 910, 876 A.2d 1201 .
discussed Cited "see" Festa v. Board of Education
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Louis Gherlone Excavating, Inc. v. McLean Construction Co., Inc., 88 Conn. App. 775, 782 , 871 A.2d 1057 , cert. granted, 274 Conn. 909 , 876 A.2d 1201 (2005) (appeal withdrawn February 3, 2006); see also Christian Activities Council, Congregational v. Town Council, 249 Conn. 566, 581 , 735 A.2d 231 (1999) (“[w]here . . . the administrative agency has made a legal determination, the scope of review ordinarily is plenary”). “[B]ecause the administrative record before us on appeal is identical to that which was before the trial court, the interests of judicial economy would not be serv…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LOUIS GHERLONE EXCAVATING COMPANY, INC.
v.
MCLEAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
SC 17454.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 22, 2005.
876 A.2d 1201
Alfred J. Zullo, in support of the petition., Michael C. Jankovsky, John Wayne Fox and Patricia M. Gang, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 775 (AC 25430), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[*910] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17454. Alfred J. Zullo, in support of the petition. Michael C. Jankovsky, John Wayne Fox and Patricia M. Gang, in opposition. Decided June 22, 2005

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the mechanic’s lien was invalid?”