green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ill v. Manzo-Ill
This discussion requires a two part analysis, because the standard for reviewing a trial court's decision on whether a motion is stale under Practice Book § 25-34(e) is the clearly erroneous standard; see Larson v. Larson, 89 Conn.App. 57 , 69, 872 A.2d 912 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 915 , 879 A.2d 892 (2005) ; and the standard for reviewing *826 whether a trial court's dismissal of an action under Practice Book § 14-3 is whether the trial court abused its discretion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aley v. Aley
(2×)
See also Larson v. Larson, 89 Conn. App. 57 , 872 A.2d 912 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 915 , 879 A.2d 892 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GARY MARTINO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 12, 2005.
Salvatore C. Adamo, special public defender, in support of the petition., Toni M. Smith-Rosario, in opposition.
Published
The petitioner Gary Martino’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 902 (AC 25205), is denied.
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Salvatore C. Adamo, special public defender, in support of the petition. Toni M. Smith-Rosario, in opposition. Decided July 12, 2005