Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Owen, 882 A.2d 670 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Owen, 882 A.2d 670 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (41 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bank of New York Mellon v. Mangiafico (connappct, 2020-07-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bank of New York Mellon v. Mangiafico
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · confidence medium
The rule is in harmony with the accepted principle that the statute of limitations does not destroy the debt but merely bars the remedy.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 815.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rosenfield v. I. David Marder & Associates, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · confidence medium
In making this argument, the plaintiff cites Fontanella v. Marcucci, 89 Conn. App. 690 , 877 A.2d 828 , cert. granted, 275 Conn. 907 , 882 A.2d 670 (2005) (appeal withdrawn March 8, 2006), for the proposition that “if the prior action does prevent enforcement of the remedy sought in the later action, then the pendency of the prior action can toll the statute of limitations in the later action.” Id., 700.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gager v. Sanger
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · confidence medium
He cites Fontanella v. Marcucci, 89 Conn. App. 690 , 877 A.2d 828 , cert. granted on other grounds, 275 Conn. 907 , 882 A.2d 670 (2005) (appeal withdrawn March 8, 2006), for the proposition that “if the prior action does prevent enforcement of the remedy sought in the later action, then the pendency of the prior action can toll the statute of limitations in the later action.” Id., 700.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, RECEIVER OF SAYBROOK BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
v.
JOSEPH E. OWEN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 12, 2005.
882 A.2d 670
James M. Nugent, in support of the petition., Donald E. Frechette, in opposition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 806 (AC 25216), is denied.