green
Positive treatment
13.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511 , 519 n.3, 874 A.2d 826 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 (2005), and cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Kadon M.
(2×)
See In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511, 529 , 874 A.2d 826 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005) (noting that father speculated guardian ad litem would have formulated an alternative to com- plete termination of parental rights while failing to address why trial counsel could not have presented such an alternative).
discussed
Cited "see"
McKechnie v. McKechnie
(2×)
See In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511, 526 , 874 A.2d 826 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005); In re Antony B., 54 Conn. App. 463, 472-73 , 735 A.2d 893 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Joseph L.
(2×)
See In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511, 521 , 874 A.2d 826 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Herman
(2×)
See, e.g., Cahaly v. Somers , 89 Conn.App. 816 , 820, 877 A.2d 837 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Oreoluwa O.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511 , 519–20 and 520 n.4, 874 A.2d 826 (respondent had standing to bring claim that the child received inadequate representation because the court failed to appoint a guardian ad litem), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005); In re Lyric H., 114 Conn. App. 582, 587 , 970 A.2d 782 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 921 , 974 A.2d 722 (2009) (considering the respon- dent’s claim that the court had a constitutional duty to appoint, sua sponte, a separate guardian ad litem for the child); cf. In re Melod…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Julianna B.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Azareon Y., supra, 139 Conn. App. 462 -63 (respondent’s claim that termination of parental rights violated parent’s substantive due process rights fails because of failure to satisfy first prong of Golding); see also In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511, 528-29 , 874 A.2d 826 (respondent’s claim that termination of parental rights violated parent’s substantive due process rights fails because of failure to satisfy third prong of Golding), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005); In re Michael L., supra, 56 Conn. App…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Christina M.
(2×)
Id., 600; see also In re Brendan C., 89 Conn. App. 511 , 520 n.4, 874 A.2d 826 (relying on In re Shaquanna M. for conclusion that respondent parent had standing to raise claim, on behalf of child, that child had received inadequate representation in termination proceeding), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 917 , 879 A.2d 893 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 910 , 882 A.2d 669 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE BRENDAN C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 12, 2005.
Joseph A. Geremia, Jr., in support of the petition., Robert W. Clark, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 511 (AC 25327), is denied.