green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Spearman v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Ali, 92 Conn.App. 427 , 435-36, 886 A.2d 449 (2005), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 909 , 894 A.2d 990 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. MARTIN V.
See State v. Schmidt, 92 Conn. App. 665, 675 , 886 A.2d 854 (2005), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 908 , 894 A.2d 989 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rowe
See State v. Schmidt, 92 Conn. App. 665, 676-77 , 886 A.2d 854 (2005) (consciousness of guilt claims are not constitutional and do not merit Golding review), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 908 , 894 A.2d 989 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McCarthy
(2×)
In Thomas , this court determined that there was no requirement to support the proposition that “a trial court must, or even may, instruct the jury that it cannot . . . use its disbelief of a witness’ testimony as affirmative proof of the opposite.” Id., 380-81 ; see also State v. Smith, 92 Conn. App. 579, 583-84 , 886 A.2d 484 (2005) (same), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 908 , 894 A.2d 990 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
TYISH SMITH
v.
TYISH SMITH
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 1, 2006.
Annacarina DelMastro, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 579 (AC 25144), is denied.
Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 1, 2006