State v. Coccomo, 978 A.2d 1112 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Coccomo, 978 A.2d 1112 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Maurice B. (connappct, 2024-10-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Maurice B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Schiller, 115 Conn. App. 189, 196 , 972 A.2d 272 (court could not conclude that remark was improper when meaning was Page 20 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0 22 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 State v. Maurice B. unclear), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 910 , 978 A.2d 1113 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Salazar
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Schiller, 115 Conn. App. 189, 196 , 972 A.2d 272 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 910 , 978 A.2d 1113 (2009). 4 The defendant also argues that the following state- ment made by the prosecutor during rebuttal argument was improper: ‘‘[T]here was no relationship in 2009 with [the victim] and the defendant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
TRICIA LYNNE COCCOMO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 2009.
978 A.2d 1112
Robert S. Bello and Thomas M. Cassone, in support of the petition., Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 384 (AC 28819), is denied.