State v. Miller, 994 A.2d 1288 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Miller, 994 A.2d 1288 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hall v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2014-09-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hall v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
The following facts, as recounted in the petitioner’s direct appeal; see State v. Hall, 120 Conn. App. 191 , 991 A.2d 598 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 903 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010); and procedural history are relevant to our reso- lution of this appeal. ‘‘On the night of June 11, 2007, Shamaila Riaz and Michael Purcell were working in the Best Way gasoline station and convenience store in Moosup.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Miles
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hall, 120 Conn. App. 191, 198 , 991 A.2d 598 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 903 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010). 3 A determination regarding the credibility of witnesses, however, is a function of the jury.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. LaVoie (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Miller, 120 Conn. App. 133, 146 , 990 A.2d 916 (statement made during closing argument referring to facts not in record constituted prosecutorial impropri- ety), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 902 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010). 2 Although we determine that the prosecutor’s com- ment was improper, we conclude that the improper comment did not deprive the defendant of his right to a fair trial.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Testa
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is not one fact, but the cumulative impact of a multitude of facts which establishes guilt in a case involving substantial circumstantial evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Morelli, 293 Conn. 147, 151-52 , 976 A.2d 678 (2009); see also State v. Hall, 120 Conn. App. 191, 196 , 991 A.2d 598 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 903 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MICHAEL P. MILLER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 20, 2010.
994 A.2d 1288
Katharine S. Goodbody, special public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 133 (AC 29672), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.