green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Commissioner of Correction
The following facts, as recounted in the petitioner’s direct appeal; see State v. Hall, 120 Conn. App. 191 , 991 A.2d 598 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 903 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010); and procedural history are relevant to our reso- lution of this appeal. ‘‘On the night of June 11, 2007, Shamaila Riaz and Michael Purcell were working in the Best Way gasoline station and convenience store in Moosup.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miles
See State v. Hall, 120 Conn. App. 191, 198 , 991 A.2d 598 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 903 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010). 3 A determination regarding the credibility of witnesses, however, is a function of the jury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Testa
It is not one fact, but the cumulative impact of a multitude of facts which establishes guilt in a case involving substantial circumstantial evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Morelli, 293 Conn. 147, 151-52 , 976 A.2d 678 (2009); see also State v. Hall, 120 Conn. App. 191, 196 , 991 A.2d 598 , cert. denied, 297 Conn. 903 , 994 A.2d 1288 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GEREMIA CHAPARRO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 20, 2010.
Gennaro Bizzarro, special public defender, in support of the petition., Michael Proto, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The petitioner Geremia Chaparro’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 41 (AC 30256), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.