Hickey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 541 A.2d 1252 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Hickey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 541 A.2d 1252 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. Gregory Hickey
v.
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Old Lyme William Spicer, Jr. v. Zoning Commission of the Noank Fire District Richard Chapman v. Zoning Commission of the Town of North Stonington Marion Stanavage v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Colchester Paul R. Beckman v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Killingworth Terrence McKenna v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Stonington Downes-Patterson Corporation v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Stonington Wells Pond Wildlife Preserve v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Wethersfield John Errichetti v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Watertown High Meadow Associates v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Watertown Gary Widlitz v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Killingworth Jeanette Lecardo v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Stratford Liberty Ridge Associates v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Chester John Nemczuk v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Lisbon GAM, Inc. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Stonington Mark Mukon v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of East Hampton
PAC 87-051; PAC 87-054; PAC 87-057; PAC 87-056; PAC 87-072; PAC 87-076; PAC 87-077; PAC 87-079; PAC 87-064; PAC 87-065; PAC 87-066; PAC 87-067; PAC 87-068; PAC 87-069; PAC 87-074; PAC 87-075; PAC 87-078; PAC 87-080; PAC 87-083; PAC 87-081.
Connecticut Appellate Court.
May 25, 1988.
541 A.2d 1252
Published
Per Curiam.

Each of these zoning appeals was dismissed in the Superior Court as jurisdictionally defective under Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 205 Conn. 413, 533 A.2d 879 (1987), affirmed on rehearing, Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 206 Conn. 374, 538 A.2d 202 (1988) (en banc). A petition for certification was filed in this court in each case. Under our supervisory powers pursuant to Practice Book § 4183, we deny each of the petitions, without prejudice to the refiling of them at a later date. We do so in order to allow the petitioners to pursue any rights afforded to them by Section 3 of Public Acts 1988, No. 88-79. Our denials of these petitions without prejudice are not intended to be final judgments under Section 3 of Public Acts 1988, No. 88-79.