Olstza v. Fenton, 560 A.2d 992 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Olstza v. Fenton, 560 A.2d 992 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raymond Olstza
v.
Robert H. Fenton
7091.
Connecticut Appellate Court.
Jun 16, 1989.
560 A.2d 992
Richard A. Fuchs, for the appellants (plaintiffs)., Agnes M. Cahill, with whom, on the brief, was Michael P. Del Sole, for the appellees (defendants).
Published
Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants in this medical malpractice action. The sole issue raised is whether the trial court correctly charged the jury on the foreseeability of harm. The charge given by the trial court in this case comports with the charge on foreseeability of harm approved by our Supreme Court in Pisel v. Stamford Hospital, 180 Conn. 314, 331-32, 430 A.2d 1 (1980).

There is no error.