Diamond v. Simmons, 567 A.2d 850 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Diamond v. Simmons, 567 A.2d 850 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Kwaak (connappct, 1990-04-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kwaak
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
The constitutional standard is met when defense counsel is permitted to expose to the jury the facts from which the jurors, as the sole triers of the facts and credibility, can appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness.” (Citations omitted.) State v. Vitale, 197 Conn. 396, 402 , 497 A.2d 956 (1985); see State v. Johnson, 20 Conn. App. 808, 809 , 567 A.2d 850 (1990); State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 718 , 478 A.2d 227 , cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jerome H. Diamond
v.
Augustus J. Simmons
7881.
Connecticut Appellate Court.
Nov 22, 1989.
567 A.2d 850
Augustus J. Simmons, pro se, the appellant (named defendant)., Richard B. Laschever, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The named defendant, in this appeal from a judgment of foreclosure by sale, claims that the trial court erred (1) in ordering him to proceed to trial, (2) in failing to consider his alleged alcohol problem, and (3) in finding for the plaintiff and rendering a judgment of foreclosure by sale. We see no merit to these claims.

[*808] The record discloses that counsel for the named defendant did not ask for a continuance, and that the named defendant failed to preserve his claim of an alleged alcohol problem. The record fails to disclose that the trial court abused its discretion or acted other than in accordance with applicable law in determining that a judgment of foreclosure by sale should enter.

There is no error.